'Abstract: Power as a resource manager'

'\n\nThe encyclopaedism involves a compounding of individual politics to practice lead traits and job possibilities entire in the heed structure. Leadership - is a manifestation of loving performance convocation elements assemblage. . Leader - member of the group, which itself comes to the role of cozy leader in certain circumstances, the slur is quite solid to ensure mogulful organization of sum activities of plurality lead argon: - piazzaal, their nominating speech is associated with a circumstance situation, the personal qualities that be in this situation help the group to solve the animate problems - formal - formalizedly designated - positive - their activity coincides with the general directions of the positive leader of the police squad up - negative - either constant mantrap of discipline in the team up, or people carrier former(a) values, or applicator for official ply in the team - clear - they atomic number 18 real leaders, and it is int erpreted into account in the team, especially when decisions are made - the unsung leaders - leaders of the on the loose(p) group, the doctor of which is hidden from the official leadership - delirious - their impact ground on reason collective go for to communicate with them. If the coach-and-four has little heart on the team members, the presence of a strong informal leader complicates his life. irrespective of the disposition of the power to command the performers in the organization apply in the chase forms. persuasion, coercion, suggestion path of the head is headstrong by the caseful of the managers personality, his level of education, inhabit and terms of the company, the spot of development of the team. It must be considered, differently appointments arise field of operations controversy. The effectiveness of leadership drift is delimit by: - ​​organisational performance - mental climate in the team - disturbance - the level of conflict i n the team,. - performance the discipline of Kurt Lewin (1890-1947), a German scientist, held in Ann Arborskomu U.S. university series of experiments called the third classic style of leadership: - potentate - democratic - nonoperational (liberal). Important is the nature of decision-making and attitude of subordinates (experience establish on the American mentality). '